Effects of Evolution on Human Society The basic law of Darwinist concept of evolution is that simpler forms of life evolve into organisms that are more complex. If we look at social progress, it will appear that it follows the same pattern – from slavery to feudalism and from feudalism to capitalism. Now we live at the beginning of post-industrial era. Therefore, we can say that biological and social progresses are closely interlinked. Modern man, in its present form, is also not the final product of evolution. It is rather an intermediary link between ape and super man.
There are many indications that confirm the validity of this statement. For example, peoples average life span in Europe in 16th century was 40 years, while today it has risen to 65 years. In addition, modern folks are much taller, on average, then their ancestors from 16th century. It only takes one visit to the museum, which displays knights armor, to realize that our ancestors very rarely taller than 54. Another basic law of evolution is survival of the fittest. When we look at the history of biological progress, it will appear that living organisms evolved to their present form through continuous process of natural selection. Therefore, the majority of species have a related sub-species that biologists refer to as dead ends of evolution. The same applies to humans.
On one hand, we have a White race, which built modern civilization, as we know it. On the other, we have races that were not able to progress beyond Stone Age, up until the time when White people began to explore the planet. Today, there are countries like UK or France, where living standards used to be unreachably high, before the advent of multiculturalism. At the same time, there are countries like Haiti, or Niger, where native people began to degrade back into the savagery, ever since White people had left. Therefore, the concept of social equality, which is being pushed down peoples throats nowadays, is unscientific, because it contradicts biologys basic notions. To conclude this paper, can say that it is biological factors that define socio-political dynamics and not the other way around.
Bibliography:
Masters, Michael The Morality of Survival. 2001. Breakthrough Texts. Stormfront Information Center. 5 Jun. 2007. http://www.crusader.net/texts/bt/bt09.html.